San Juan Mountains

San Juan Mountains
San Juan Mountains: Grenadier Range

Monday, July 25, 2016

NYC Criminalizes Calling A Trannie A Trannie

I just read that the executives in charge of politically correct decision making at the National Basketball Association have made the decision to pull the plug on the NBA All-Star game that was scheduled to be played in Charlotte, NC next season.  Do you know why they are going to move the game to another town?  Because politicians in North Carolina recently approved a new law that requires men to use men's public bathrooms.  Horrific, isn't it?  I can certainly understand why no ho-beating NBA thug would want to visit a town like that.  It goes contrary to their most dearly held values.  Beating up your ho is just good family leadership but forcing a man to pee in a men's room is unacceptable. 
There are very few legitimate transvestites in the universe.  That fact does not stop the LGBTXYZ movement from exploiting the idea of the persecuted trannie to garner more political power for themselves.  That fact also does not stop the Progressives from championing the cause of a largely imaginary group of people as they push the Socialist Democracy of Amerika more and more into a post-Christian society.  The latest attack of the killer trannies and their Progressive handlers that I have found is in the code of laws that rule the people who have made the terrible decision to live in New York City.   Let me tell you about that today.
NYC has a "Local Law No. 3 (2002); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102(23)," found here, that was drawn up to, "prohibit unlawful discrimination in public accommodations, housing and employment on the basis of gender.  Gender is defined as one’s 'actual or perceived sex (emphasis not in the original) and shall also include a person’s gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior or expression, whether or not that gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior or expression is different from that traditionally associated with the legal sex assigned to that person at birth.'"   That law is easy enough to understand.  It declares that a government protected group, known generally as trannie perverts, has been given the authority to control the behavior of other people and thereby legally force them to do and say particular things to and for them.  This is the perfect law for LGBTXYZs because they all need daily affirmation of their perverted lifestyles or they will commit suicide.
As is the case with militant heterophobes (homosexuals with a pathological fear and hatred for heterosexuals, especially Christian heterosexuals) and their agenda for world domination, anyone whom the government believes is "serving the public" is required to follow the new rules.  That means that a Christian baker, a Christian apartment owner seeking a tenant, a Christian church seeking a secretary or a Christian person doing anything that engages the perverted public must comply with this law or face the consequences.  Just what does compliance with the law involve?  Here are a couple of examples from the City code:
  • The NYCHRL requires employers and covered entities to use an individual’s preferred name, pronoun and title (e.g., Ms./Mrs.) regardless of the individual’s sex assigned at birth, anatomy, gender, medical history, appearance, or the sex indicated on the individual’s identification....Most individuals and many transgender people use female or male pronouns and titles.  Some transgender and gender non-conforming people prefer to use pronouns other than he/him/his or she/her/hers, such as they/them/theirs or ze/hir.
  •  The NYCHRL requires that individuals be permitted to use single-sex facilities, such as bathrooms or locker rooms, and participate in single-sex programs, consistent with their gender, regardless of their sex assigned at birth, anatomy, medical history, appearance, or the sex indicated on their identification....Some people, including, for example, customers, other program participants, tenants, or employees, may object to sharing a facility or participating in a program with a transgender or gender non-conforming person.  Such objections are not a lawful reason to deny access to that transgender or gender non-conforming individual.
  •  Employers and covered entities are entitled to enforce a dress code, or require specific grooming or appearance standards; however it must be done without imposing restrictions or requirements specific to gender or sex.  It will not be a defense that an employer or covered entity is catering to the preferences of their customers or clients.
Wonderful, isn't it?  That handful of beautiful laws makes me want to pack up and move to NYC.  So let me get this straight.....If some male pervert comes to my church and applies for the job of church secretary and identifies himself as Ze. Pervert, I am in violation of the law if I call him Mr. Pervert.  If Mr. Pervert then wants to use the bathroom I must allow him to use the Ladies Room in my church, even if it is filled with women at the time.  Then, after I decide to hire him to avoid a long and expensive lawsuit for pervert discrimination, I may not impose a dress code that requires him to dress like a man without being in violation of the new law.  Think I am exaggerating here?  Let me gives you some examples of violations of the above three laws taken straight from the code itself:
  • Intentional or repeated refusal to use an individual’s preferred name, pronoun or title.  For example, repeatedly calling a transgender woman “him” or “Mr.” after she has made clear which pronouns and title she uses (such as Ze, ed)....Refusal to use an individual’s preferred name, pronoun, or title because they do not conform to gender stereotypes.  For example, calling a woman “Mr.” because her appearance is aligned with traditional gender-based stereotypes of masculinity.
  • Prohibiting a transgender or gender non-conforming person from using the single-sex program or facility consistent with their gender identity or expression.  For example, it is an unlawful discriminatory practice to prohibit a transgender woman from using the women’s bathroom.... Barring someone from a program or facility out of concern that a transgender or gender non-conforming person will make others uncomfortable
  • Requiring employees of one gender to wear a uniform specific to that gender....Permitting female but not male residents at a drug treatment facility to wear wigs and high heels (my favorite example, ed).
Given the horrific nature of the crimes specified above it is important that a just and appropriate punishment be levied against the person who violates the law.  What are the punishments for said violation?  The code tells us when it says, "The Commission can impose civil penalties up to $125,000 for violations, and up to $250,000 for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct."  Well there you have it.  If Ze. Pervert comes to my establishment and I accidentally refer to him as Mr. Pervert rather than his desired Ze. Pervert I am guilty of a crime and subject to a fine of $125,000.  If Ze. Pervert can prove, or just allege, that I "did it on purpose" (does this sound extremely childish to anyone besides me?) I can be fined $250,000.  
I wonder....is it possible this law will incentivize perverts to walk around carrying recording devices into establishments that serve the public and try to entrap some hapless business owners into accidentally using Mr. or Mrs. instead of Ze. and Hir. when addressing them?  How about incentivizing the war on the Christian Church?  Can you imagine any pervert using this law to entrap the leadership of a Bible believing church into a violation of the law, thus forcing the church to cough up hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for the unlawful and allegedly immoral behavior of its leaders?  
It is hard for me to imagine a more silly body of laws than this one.  Every single part of this code reeks of personal insecurity and the desire to control the amoral behavior of others.   Are trannies, and their LBGTXYZ handlers, really so pathetically weak and emotionally unstable they need the power and force of law to ensure nobody every calls them a name they don't want to hear?  Answer:  Yes!  Trannies, heterophobes and their ilk are all emotional sissies who use the coercive power of civil government to force normal people like you and me to affirm their aberrant and sinful lifestyle choices.  If we do not do so we will be fined.  If we do affirm them we deny what we know to be morally right and true about the universe we live in.  In other words, we all now live in a post-Christian society where merely believing biblical truth is illegal.

No comments:

Post a Comment